Sunday, 19 July 2026

Top 10 Mistakes Companies Make Before Filing a DRHP : Lessons for a Successful IPO Journey

 
TOP 10 MISTAKES COMPANIES MAKE BEFORE FILING A DRHP: LESSONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL IPO JOURNEY
 
By CS Ravi Garg, Company Secretary


 
An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is one of the most significant milestones in a company's lifecycle. It not only provides access to capital but also transforms a privately held business into a publicly accountable enterprise. However, the journey towards listing begins much before the filing of the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP).
 
In practice, many companies receive observations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) due to gaps in governance, disclosures, documentation, or compliance. These issues often delay the IPO process, increase costs, and impact investor confidence.
 
This article highlights ten common mistakes companies should avoid before filing their DRHP.

Here are the Top 10 mistakes every company should avoid before filing its DRHP:

🏛️ Weak Corporate Governance
📚 Poor Statutory Records
⚠️ Inadequate Material Disclosures
🤝 Related Party Transaction Issues
📊 Weak Internal Financial Controls
💰 Capital Structure Irregularities
📄 Inaccurate Risk Factor Disclosures
📁 Incomplete Due Diligence Documentation
👥 Promoter & Group Entity Disclosure Gaps
Delayed IPO Planning

 1. Weak Corporate Governance 🏛️
 
Corporate governance is one of the first aspects evaluated during IPO due diligence. Companies often postpone strengthening their governance framework until the IPO process begins, which can lead to avoidable challenges.
 
Common gaps include:
  • Improper Board composition
  • Delay in appointing Independent Directors
  • Non-functional Board Committees
  • Weak governance policies
 
Relevant Provisions:
  • Companies Act, 2013 (Sections 149, 177 & 178)
  • SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015
 
2. Poor Maintenance of Statutory Records 📚
 
Accurate statutory records demonstrate a company's compliance culture. Missing registers, unsigned minutes, or incomplete filings often become red flags during legal and secretarial due diligence.
 
Common issues include:
  • Incomplete statutory registers
  • Missing Board and Shareholders' approvals
  • Non-compliance with Secretarial Standards
 Relevant Provisions:
  • Companies Act, 2013
  • Secretarial Standards SS-1 & SS-2 issued by ICSI

3. Inadequate Material Disclosures ⚠️
 
The DRHP must provide complete, accurate, and transparent disclosures. Failure to disclose material litigation, regulatory proceedings, contingent liabilities, or significant contracts may attract SEBI observations.
 
Common omissions include:
  • Pending litigation
  • Regulatory actions
  • Material contracts
  • Contingent liabilities
 
Relevant Provisions:
  • SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018
  • Schedule VI – Disclosure Requirements
 
4. Related Party Transactions Not at Arm's Length 🤝
 
Related Party Transactions (RPTs) receive close regulatory scrutiny. Companies should ensure that all RPTs are appropriately approved, documented, and conducted on an arm's length basis.
 
Common concerns include:
  • Lack of approvals
  • Weak documentation
  • Pricing inconsistencies
Relevant Provisions:
  • Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations
 
5. Weak Internal Financial Controls 📊
 
A listed company is expected to maintain a robust internal control environment. Unresolved audit observations or inadequate documentation of controls may adversely affect IPO readiness.
 
Key issues:
  • Weak Internal Financial Controls (IFC)
  • Pending internal audit observations
  • Lack of documented control processes
 
 Relevant Provision:
  • Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013
 
6. Capital Structure Irregularities 💰
 
The company's capital structure should be clean, transparent, and compliant before filing the DRHP.
 
Typical issues include:
  • Pending share allotments
  • ESOP-related irregularities
  • Unresolved convertible securities
 
These issues may require restructuring before proceeding with the IPO.
 
7. Generic or Incomplete Risk Factor Disclosures 📄
 
Risk factors should be specific to the company's business model and industry. Generic disclosures fail to provide meaningful information to investors.
 
Examples include:
  • Business-specific operational risks
  • Industry risks
  • Regulatory risks
  • Financial risks
 
Relevant Provisions:
  • Schedule VI of SEBI (ICDR) Regulations
 8. Incomplete Due Diligence Documentation 📁
 
Due diligence involves verification of every material aspect of the business. Missing documentation often delays the IPO timeline.
 
Critical documents include:
  • Title deeds
  • Licences
  • Material agreements
  • Intellectual property records
  • Regulatory approvals
 
9. Promoter and Group Entity Disclosure Gaps 👥
 
SEBI expects complete transparency regarding promoters and group entities.
 
Common deficiencies include:
  • Non-disclosure of related entities
  • Pending promoter litigation
  • Conflict of interest
  • Incomplete business relationship disclosures
 
Transparent disclosures significantly enhance investor confidence.
 
10. Starting IPO Preparation Too Late
 
Perhaps the biggest mistake is assuming that an IPO can be completed within a few months. Successful IPOs are usually the result of structured planning over 12–24 months.
 
Early preparation provides sufficient time to:
  • Strengthen governance
  • Resolve litigation
  • Improve internal controls
  • Streamline the capital structure
  • Complete due diligence
  • Address compliance gaps
 
Key Takeaways
IPO readiness is a continuous governance exercise rather than a one-time compliance activity.
Strong corporate governance and transparent disclosures build investor confidence.
Early identification and resolution of compliance gaps help reduce SEBI observations.
Company Secretaries play a strategic role in ensuring legal compliance, governance excellence, and successful IPO execution.
 
Conclusion
Preparing for an IPO is far more than drafting a DRHP. It requires an organization-wide commitment to governance, transparency, compliance, and accountability. Companies that invest time in strengthening their governance framework well before approaching the capital markets are better positioned for a smoother regulatory review and a successful listing.
 
A well-planned IPO not only facilitates capital raising but also enhances the company's credibility, strengthens stakeholder confidence, and lays the foundation for long-term sustainable growth.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for knowledge sharing and educational purposes. Readers should refer to the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018, the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, and other applicable laws, along with subsequent amendments, before taking any decision.


Regards,
CS Ravi Garg

 


Ravi Garg

  TOP 10 MISTAKES COMPANIES MAKE BEFORE FILING A DRHP: LESSONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL IPO JOURNEY   By CS Ravi Garg, Company Secretary   An Initia...